[x]

deviantART

 
:icononceisonce:

~ONCEisONCE

Derek
ProfileGalleryPrintsFavesJournal
About Me Member Procrastinator ONCEisONCEMale/United States Recent Activity Deviant for 1 Year
Needs Premium Membership Statistics 9 Deviations
150 Comments
818 Pageviews
Sign up to follow this artist's work

Journal

No journal entries yet.

Devious Info

  • Current Residence: Earth
  • deviantWEAR sizing preference: Small...?
  • Print preference: Huh?
  • Interests: Surfing, drawing (attempting to), photo manipulation, photography
  • Favourite movie: too many!
  • Favourite band or musician: Haste the Day, Scary Kids Scaring Kids, Alexisonfire, Dark Rain, blah blah blah....
  • Favourite genre of music: Good music
  • Favourite artist: Anyone who is good
  • Favourite poet or writer: not so much
  • Favourite photographer: Me :3
  • MP3 player of choice: iPood
  • Shell of choice: Koopa Red Shell
  • Skin of choice: Skin that tans ><
  • Favourite game: Super Smash Bros!!
  • Favourite gaming platform: Wii
  • Tools of the Trade: My digital camera, Photoshop CS2

deviantART Notice

[x]

Webcam

Comments


Hidden by Owner
~ONCEisONCE:iconONCEisONCE: Feb 2, 2008, 1:34:30 AM
ok. but is flaunting your parts artistic? no. its pornographic. those need to removed

--
When God gives you lemons, FIND A NEW GOD!!
Hidden by Owner
=chrisbucks:iconchrisbucks: Feb 2, 2008, 1:36:41 AM
The rules ban erections and spread labia or bullocks, so I'm not sure what 'flaunting' you're referring to.

--
Click to protest FairExposure | Help! I'm being repressed! | You're too stupid to be an atheist
Hidden by Owner
~Laykien:iconLaykien: Feb 1, 2008, 1:11:02 PM
No he shouldn't have, that was an amazing sculpture and a piece of art, I don't consider nude photographs art. If it is a drawing that isn't in any way suggestive thats alright to, like a nude pregnant woman holding her belly, I consider that art, photos, no. They don't show any beauty, I think they are ugly. Just a random naked woman...or man, no thank you. I come here for ART not to see naked bodies laydown, standing up, tied up whatever...

Not saying photos are bad, like some of yours are very nice. I would probably be less frustrated with artistic nude if it was required to censor private areas.

--
To the world you may just be one person...but to one person you may be the world...
Hidden by Owner
=chrisbucks:iconchrisbucks: Feb 1, 2008, 1:29:26 PM
So what's so different about a nude sculpture and a nude photo? Aren't the they same subject matter? What about paintings? If you painted a nude in a realist style? I don't see what the difference is.

And saying that is ugly is horribly demeaning to the models of these photos.

--
Click to protest FairExposure | Help! I'm being repressed! | You're too stupid to be an atheist
Hidden by Owner
~Laykien:iconLaykien: Feb 1, 2008, 1:42:54 PM
Well :shrug: thats how I feel, and the sculpture takes more time...WAY more time then a photo. More effort and thought in my eyes. And it depends on the painting. I guess that should have been my first reply to you. It all DEPENDS. I still don't want to see private areas of those people. The sculpture is a true piece of art and I am ok with it (though I personally wouldn't make one) I admire those who can

Not trying to make anyone upset just voicing my opinion, ONCEisONCE is a good friend of mine and I personally wouldn't have posted something against it, enless it was a reply to something someone else posted.

Hes a good person with strong beliefs :) I agree to disagree with you. Don't really want to argue about it just my point of view

--
To the world you may just be one person...but to one person you may be the world...
Hidden by Owner
=chrisbucks:iconchrisbucks: Feb 1, 2008, 2:05:28 PM
Just seems like a weird double standard to be honest. There's nude photography going back over 100 years, and a lot in museums and fine art galleries. I don't see how the length of time taken to develop the image/product is of any relevence.

In the time taken to produce a b/w image of a nude model, a skilled sketch artist could do a very good and detailed drawing. (this is developing time, printing time, etc).

--
Click to protest FairExposure | Help! I'm being repressed! | You're too stupid to be an atheist
Hidden by Owner
~Laykien:iconLaykien: Feb 1, 2008, 2:14:15 PM
You do have a point, and it is weird and hard to explain for myself. I just see a big difference

--
To the world you may just be one person...but to one person you may be the world...
(1 Reply)
Hidden by Owner
=chrisbucks:iconchrisbucks: Feb 1, 2008, 12:02:36 PM
Yeah but you're dodging my question, is Michelangelos David pornographic? If not, then why not?

--
Click to protest FairExposure | Help! I'm being repressed! | You're too stupid to be an atheist
Previous Page1234Next Page

Site Map